Blog News -

JOHNS V. STATE – A12A1794: The Importance of Court Reporters

Johns vs. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals On March 23, 2010, Brian Louis Johns, Jr. got into an argument with his live-in girlfriend in his girlfriend’s apartment and damaged some of her clothes. She called the police. Johns left, and when the police showed up at his girlfriend’s apartment, she told them that Johns […]

Read More

Intoxilyzer 5000 Receives State-Wide Ban in Pennsylvania

After the ruling of a Dauphin County Judge in Pennsylvania concerning the accuracy of the Intoxilyzer 5000, PA state police have now issued a state-wide ban on the breath-testing machine. Previously only local police had issued the machine, but now no one in Pennsylvania pulled over for DUI will be asked to take an Intoxilyzer test. […]

Read More

SUTTON V. STATE – A12A2223: Measuring the Reliability of Anonymous Informants

Sutton v. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals In late 2010, an informant by the alias “It” contacted the Flowery Branch Police Department with allegations that Eric Sutton was using and distributing illegal drugs. “It” claimed to have received his information from “Source A” as identified in the affidavit. “It” had a personal relationship […]

Read More

STALLINGS V. STATE – A12A1929: Gauging the Influence of Objectionable Evidence Presented to a Jury

Stallings v. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals At 1:00 a.m. on March 26, 2011, a DeKalb County Police Officer responded to a call about a driver asleep at the wheel of an intersection. Upon reaching the intersection, the officer saw Dominique Stallings’ vehicle, which fit the description, parked irregularly in a nearby parking […]

Read More

COGHLAN V. STATE – A12A2388 – The Nature of Evidence in a DUI Investigation

Coghlan v. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals Around 2:00 a.m. on September 16, 2006, Donna J. Coghlan was pulled over for driving on the wrong side of the road. The officer approached the vehicle and noticed a strong odor of alcohol. When he took Coghlan’s license and walked back to his patrol car to […]

Read More

CRIDER v. STATE – A12A2414: The Gray-Areas of Miranda and Initial DUI Investigations

Crider v. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals Terri Crider was pulled over for failure to maintain the lane. When the officer made contact with Crider, he noticed the odor of alcohol on her breath, bloodshot and glassy eyes, and slightly slurred speech. Crider admitted to having been drinking and even said that she was […]

Read More

JONES V. STATE – A12A1795: Is Implied Consent Dead?

Jones v. State (2013) – Georgia Court of Appeals On October 30, 2011, Robert Lee Jones was pulled over, and after a standard investigation, arrested for suspicion of DUI. The arresting officer read Jones his implied consent rights, specifically asking if Jones would submit to a blood test. Jones agreed and was transported to the jail […]

Read More

Concern Grows Over Accuracy of Intoxilyzer 8000 and Other CMI, Inc. Breathing Testing Machines

Advancements in technology are supposed to mean just that: advancement, improvement. New generations of machines are meant to be stronger, sleeker, more reliable, more efficient, and more accurate than the last generation. Unfortunately, CMI, Inc., the company that manufactures the Intoxilyzer line of breath-testing machines, is bucking the trend. Since as early as 2009 there have […]

Read More

Seated Field Sobriety Tests May Expose Questions of Reliability in Standard FSTs

Local officers in Pell City, Alabama have been trained and certified to conduct sit-down field sobriety tests to help investigate boating under the influence (BUI) on the nearby Coosa River. Proponents claim these sit-down tests could be used in roadside investigations as well: “the seated tests are useful if during a traffic stop the person […]

Read More