What this means is there is a little statistical basis for requiring first offender DUI Defendants to have alcohol breath testers installed in their vehicles. All of those first offenders who drive for a living or drive company cars or trucks would be fired. Employees that have to drive for work and truck drivers would request jury trials in almost every case to avoid unemployment. This could push an already overwhelmed and underfunded judiciary to the brink. The money would have to be allocated from parks, roads, speed enforcement, schools, etc. A one hundred pound woman can be over .08 legal limit with as little as two glasses of wine. The only people to gain from a new law requiring alcohol breath testers installed on the first offender DUI Defendants would be the owners of interlock alcohol breath testing devices for car installers and their manufacturers and politicians who need cheap political capital. Don’t believe the hype. Speeding kills more than twice the number of drivers than alcohol-related fatalities and no one is requiring speed governors and jail time for speeders. Texting while driving is more dangerous than driving over the DUI legal limit, but no is requiring smartphone manufacturers to disable the devices when in motion. #hypocritocracy
I have ordered the date for NHTSA to see how many of Georgia’s Alcohol-Related Offenders had previous DUI convictions. To be continued.
– Author: George C. Creal Jr.